The Resource For Musicals



Simply Sondheim Forum


Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Least Favorite Sondheim Show 
Author Message
Supporting Player
Supporting Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:57 pm
Posts: 161
Location: United States
Post 
And it is that kind of attitude that is absolutely despicable. I don't care whether you think that your opinion on the show is right. You are nobody to treat me or anyone else with rudeness.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:57 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 8:33 am
Posts: 3056
Location: Musical Cyberspace
Current Obsession: Musicals!
Post Nope, sorry...
Once again, I'm not here to seek your approval or your blessing and your opinion of me doesn't bother me in the least.

_________________
Image
VISIT MUSICAL CYBERSPACE: A TRIBUTE TO THE MUSICALS OF BROADWAY AND BEYOND.


Last edited by RainbowJude on Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:40 am, edited 3 times in total.



Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:07 pm
Profile WWW
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
Broadway Legend / MdN Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 2917
Location: Lancaster, PA
Main Role: Fan
Post 
For God's sake how old are we children?

Agree to disagree and move on.

_________________
R-E-S-P-E-C-T
Image
MdN Superlatives 2009 - Most Likely to Post Breaking News
http://bestpicturenoms.wordpress.com/


Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:54 am
Profile WWW
Supporting Player
Supporting Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:57 pm
Posts: 161
Location: United States
Post 
I can certainly agree to disagree about a musical (as I did much earlier in the thread), but I won't be treated rudely.


Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:21 am
Profile
Supporting Player
Supporting Player

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 5:49 pm
Posts: 121
Location: Australia
Post 
Personally, I am quite partial to "Passion" and I think it's quite well written to boot.

But I'm not going to turn around and accuse anyone who disagrees with my views of being "wrong" and heap dirt on them, as RainbowJude has done here.

I think many of RainbowJude's points about the structure and thematic depth of "Passion" are valid - but his rudeness, arrogance and puffed up elitism took my breath away.

He should apologise for his behaviour and the moderators should exercise some discipline. Frankly, I find it amazing that anyone can get away with so baldly insulting people on this board.


Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:30 am
Profile
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:21 pm
Posts: 1146
Location: Norway
Main Role: Performer
Post 
As my science teacher said a few days ago; "If you don't have knowledge then you have nothing to say whatsoever when it comes to analyzing and stating if something is good or bad."

I really like this quote, because there is a great difference between good and entertaining. If something is good isn't subjective, it's objective. Weather it's entertaining or not is a matter of subjective opinion.

Passion is not a badly written show, if somebody is to claim that, then they don't have the fundamental knowledge needed to analyze a musical.

Facts aren't degrading or rude, facts are facts.

_________________
I never use smilies. So do not mistake me for being rude for not returning a wink or a smile.


Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:53 am
Profile
Tony Winner
Tony Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:38 pm
Posts: 433
Location: In your dreams...
Current Obsession: Falsettos (forever), Avenue Q, The Scottsboro Boys
Main Role: Performer
Post 
Into the woods I think sometimes get child like. And the first version of Bounce.

_________________
Do you know how great my life is...saving lives and loving you..


Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:33 pm
Profile
Supporting Player
Supporting Player

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2003 5:49 pm
Posts: 121
Location: Australia
Post 
High-baritonne wrote:
There is a great difference between good and entertaining. If something is good isn't subjective, it's objective. Weather it's entertaining or not is a matter of subjective opinion.

Facts aren't degrading or rude, facts are facts.


True. Facts are not rude or degrading in and of themselves.

The thing is, facts can be expressed without stooping to personal insults or arrogant self-aggrandising behaviour, as RainbowJude has done. His petulance in making his point was just uncalled for.

Facts can be expressed with a modicum of politeness and civility, there is absolutely no need to throw personal insults into the mix as well. All it does is reduce serious analysis to the level of schoolyard argument, which is exactly what RainbowJude did.

Again, RainbowJude should apologise for his behaviour and the moderators should exercise some discipline... or else it sets a worrying precedent.

Is insulting people just going to become kosher on these boards now????


Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:12 pm
Profile
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 4:55 am
Posts: 1957
Location: Norway
Post 
Jaded Mandarin wrote:
Is insulting people just going to become kosher on these boards now????


I think the situation is the opposite. It has always been kosher here for anyone to state unfounded opinions, and then go bananas when someone challenge them and scream that it's only an opinion.

_________________
Image

Formerly known as Dvarg

\"Hans usually knows his shitt when it comes to theatre.\" - Salome

\"You all are f***ing crazy, except Hans, who is actually quite smart\" - Jennyanydots


Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:00 am
Profile
Supporting Player
Supporting Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:57 pm
Posts: 161
Location: United States
Post 
Quote:
As my science teacher said a few days ago; "If you don't have knowledge then you have nothing to say whatsoever when it comes to analyzing and stating if something is good or bad."


Passion is not a badly written show, if somebody is to claim that, then they don't have the fundamental knowledge needed to analyze a musical.


Theatre is not a science. There is no formula for a good musical, a show cannot be analyzed like a science experiment and quality cannot be measured with a chemistry set.


Your statement is completely untrue. There is no "fact" when it comes to judging the quality of a show. If that was the case, then it could be recorded into a textbook what is well-written and what isn't, and dictated to theatre students. The truth is that even the people who know the most about theatre disagree all the time on whether a show is "good" or not. What one person may consider a great musical, another person doesn't.

Most of us agree on here that South Pacific and West Side Story are great musicals, right? Well Stephen Sondheim doesn't think so. Does that make him "wrong"? Hell no. It's just his opinion, and frankly I'd be inclined to say that it's much more valid than anyone else's. Would you personally insult him to his face? I sure hope not. West Side Story is generally regarded as one of the great musicals of the 20th century. Sondheim thinks that it is overrated and nothing more than pretty music with cardboard characters and lyrics that don't fit the situations of the characters at all. And yet, Sondheim thinks The Wiz, as a musical, "works", which a lot of people on here consider to be a really stupid show. So, who's right? Stephen Sondheim or everyone else? It just goes to show that there is no "fact" on what is good and what isn't.




Quote:
It has always been kosher here for anyone to state unfounded opinions, and then go bananas when someone challenge them and scream that it's only an opinion.



"Challenging an opinion" and "heaping dirt" are two very different things, friend.



I certainly have no trouble with someone challenging/disagreeing with my opinions. But personal insults are unacceptable.


Last edited by LeocadiaBegbick on Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:14 am, edited 3 times in total.



Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:07 am
Profile
Broadway Legend
Broadway Legend

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:21 pm
Posts: 1146
Location: Norway
Main Role: Performer
Post 
And then we have genres. Vamp - Hallo - Adjø is the best Juke-Box Musical I've ever seen, although I've seen much better musicals. There is a difference in how to state if something is good or bad. And we can analyze the music, the lyrics and the book. The thing is that a good musical should have a link and balance between the book, lyrics and music.

A musical should also need to be a musical, or at least in it's own genre. And there should always be a reason to sing, same as an actor always shall have a reason to rise up from a chair! If a song isn't needed for the story or characterizations, then it should be cut. If none of the songs are needed for the musical, then the musical per question should not exist, because it should have been a play. Repetition is a good device in musicals, but a musical which doesn't use repetition for a reason other than making the theater goers fund of the music is not good, unless it books and lyrics are so great that it weighs up for the bad music.

Musicals can be ripped to pieces if you choose to. You can analyze them right down to it's core. That is what directors, producers, composers, lyricists and book writers do all the time during for example previews. And some people are like Sondheim, and does not publish a show just because the audience like it, and cut songs if they're unnecessary. Others are like Webber who seek the huge audience, he wants the crowd, which is great, but then he has to chose what he wants to do, create a masterpiece that most people won't see, or create a commercial success musical which most musical knowers will find fun and entertaining, but bad.

Perfect example from my side:
I love Sunset Boulevard, it's something about it that I just never tire off! But it is not a good musical, the musical themes are repeated without any reason except getting the audience to love the songs, because the more often we hear them, the easier they get stuck in our brains.

_________________
I never use smilies. So do not mistake me for being rude for not returning a wink or a smile.


Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:05 am
Profile
Supporting Player
Supporting Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:57 pm
Posts: 161
Location: United States
Post 
And yet Clive Barnes, one of the most respected critics to write for the New York Times, praised Mamma Mia, a show that most self-respecting theatre people consider to be utter garbage. Would you say that he "lacked the fundamental knowledge needed to analyze a musical"?


Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:11 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.