Musicals.Net
http://musicals.net/forums/

1973 vs. 2000
http://musicals.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=50291
Page 5 of 6

Author:  Lazarus (Adam G) [ Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

I like Ted Neeley because his voice is weak; he's small, and he looks like you could beat the crap out of him without even trying.

Jesus is supposed to be vunerable, quite, and weak, if you want a human Jesus. This is why Ted Neeley is perfect.

Author:  jessiemil42 [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

In the 2000 version, I thought Jerome Pradon could've done a better job with the role of Judas. Not that I'm a professional, but either he could've improved with Judas or would've been amazing as Jesus (not that their Jesus wasn't amazing)!

I prefer the '73 version because it wasn't as cheesy rock, and it stayed true to the original recording.

Plus, Ted Neely is the best Jesus I've ever seen or heard.

Author:  Jekkienumber24601 [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

I have to say the new one is worth it just for Annas singing and Jerome's performance.

Author:  Lazarus (Adam G) [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:30 pm ]
Post subject: 

I was talking to someone recently, and he made a point about Pradon:

Anthony Hopkins is an amazing actor...but does that mean he should be in musical theater? Hell no.

Just because Pradon can act doesn't mean he should've played Judas; it's way out of his range. He's got a great baritone, but a shit tenor range.

Author:  rock_musicals [ Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:15 pm ]
Post subject: 

I definitley thought that the 2000 version was crappy cheesey pop-rock.

Author:  Brother Marvin Hinten, S. [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:53 am ]
Post subject: 

There's actually some good guitar, it's just buried in ALW's orchestral crap. Basically, there was some good, but ALW pulled a BAT III on JCS with the 2000 revival.

Author:  Lazarus (Adam G) [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 11:56 am ]
Post subject: 

[quote="Brother Marvin Hinten, S."]There's actually some good guitar, [quote]

Yeah, but you have to take out the shitty vocals to really hear it. :(

Author:  jessiemil42 [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:36 pm ]
Post subject: 

Lazarus (Adam G) wrote:
Brother Marvin Hinten, S. wrote:
There's actually some good guitar,
Quote:

Yeah, but you have to take out the shitty vocals to really hear it. :(


you go Adam G!
you go!

Author:  jcstar [ Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'm quitre fond of the organ and piano bits in the 2000 version. That guy can play!!

Andy.

Author:  freddierox [ Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:09 pm ]
Post subject: 

I have to say, '73 all the way! I absolutely love Ted Neeley, because his voice makes me tremble every time i listen to Gesthemane(seven years later and it still doesnt get old.) The '00 one was ok but...
-Glenn Carter had a good voice, but it was wimpy
-Jerome Pradon sounded somewhat like a banshee, and during the betrayal he looked more like a man on narcotics than a tortured soul
-Fred Johnson sounded and acted like a cartoon character
I can see that it could have worked with better singers. But i absolutely love the '73 version.

Author:  rock_musicals [ Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

freddierox wrote:
I have to say, '73 all the way! I absolutely love Ted Neeley, because his voice makes me tremble every time i listen to Gesthemane(seven years later and it still doesnt get old.) The '00 one was ok but...
-Glenn Carter had a good voice, but it was wimpy
-Jerome Pradon sounded somewhat like a banshee, and during the betrayal he looked more like a man on narcotics than a tortured soul
-Fred Johnson sounded and acted like a cartoon character
I can see that it could have worked with better singers. But i absolutely love the '73 version.


I have to disagree about Glenn's voice. I think its "whiny" and annoying. Other than that (and how you said it the '00 movie was ok, which I disagree) I agree with you. Pradon looks like a druggie. Johnson has a rediculous voice.

Author:  kittengoespop [ Mon Nov 13, 2006 4:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

I do admit that the 2000 movie has its faults, but I like it better than the 1973 version because I hate the 1973 version. But I've said that already, and quite frankly, I'm getting a little tired of being the only person in the freaking world who thinks so.

Page 5 of 6 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/