Archive for Musicals.Net Musicals.Net
 


       Musicals.Net Forums -> The Stage Door
Sandra

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE MUSICALS?

Hi, I'm writing a paper about why do people (especially in England) like musicals so much. Many of the musicals are played many many times. Can someone please tell me, why is it so?? What is so special about musicals, that they are so popular??
The Very Angry Woman

Sex.
TheWitch

I second that.
Salome

seriously though..a musical theatre piece speaks to you on a gut level. a character pouringo ut their emotions in a song..be it comical,angst ridden, forlorn or otherwise is quite intimite.
music is my life!!!

well, musicals are a combination of 2 of my fave things - music and theatre. Need i say more? Wink

x x x
KBecks

its music and emotion -- and I think people enjoy singing and in their hearts want to sing.... and the music and lyrics can convey mood and feeling so well
what_the_heck013

Most of the old classic have a happy "warm and fuzzy" feeling. People like these types of musicals to give them an escape from their lives. Musicals can also help people to look at themselves and the world around them.
allieoop

Emotional, whether joyful or depressing.
Addicting.
happyguava

I think music is one of the most amazing ways of expressing emotion - it has this fantastic power. Musical theatre is able to draw you in, and the music is so meaningful because you know the characters; you know who they are, their past and what they are going through, so you feel for them through the music.
EponinesRain

I guess musicals are like any other medium, in that they can reflect the culture and history of a certain time and place. People may relate to the narratives they tell in that way. Or, it’s just another medium that can mobilize different schools of thought so that people can experience something foreign. It lets spectators live vicariously. What's even better is that the spectator can buy/participate in extra items related to the show (cds, posters, websites, forums!) once it's over, so he can relive it whenever he wants to!

The medium of film is so successful b/c it’s not afraid to be provocative or experimental, either. Hollywood is so daring b/c it’s as far as the American spirit could go (in the West), so it naturally became a cultural, creative dumping ground! But, you’re asking about England so…

With any type of theatre, it’s always a spectacle to watch something live right in front of you. This is b/c the performers and the audience form a reciprocal relationship. Though actors need to stay in character and run through the same story, there is never a show that is exactly the same just b/c it is live! When asked how live theatre differs from film, Laurence Fishburne said, “You never know what’s going to happen. It’s like hopping on a train, and you don’t get off until it’s over.” This keeps things interesting and unpredictable for both the performers and the audience. That’s why people don’t mind watching musicals that “are played many many times.” I’m sure people also go to see the same shows b/c they wonder if actor X can keep his performance up to par every single night. Or, they’re fascinated that he/she can belt out those notes eight shows a week! I’m sure that the performers on this forum can also attest to the rush and adrenaline they get from being on a live stage. So, the audience feeds off the actors as much as the other way around.

As for the music part…I did a report about this, too…But the others are right about it expressing a world of emotions that words can't really do. I’ll see what I can dig up later. Sorry for the long post, but I hope it helps you out!
christinadaae

I hate to say something so lame after such a great post but...


Theater can be compared to television, except it is live and more emotional.
And musical theater songs can be compared to "everyday music". They are just personalized to a specific event, emotion, etc...


Why do people like television and music?
Dvarg

Personally I like musical theatre because characters expressing themselves through song that exists on the same diegetic level as the rest of the action creates a special sort of authenticity that suits my habitus.

I'm also fond of musicals because of other cultural codes inherent to the genre, like singability combined with actability (which ideally results in a particular form of dramaturgy), the emphasis on text (instead of an emphasis on for example orchestrations or the voice "as an instrument") which in particularly includes an emphasis on correct rhymes.

Preferably a musical expands and nuances my intellectual and/or emotional horizon and perspective, but I can also enjoy fluff if it takes the genre and it's audience seriously.

I can't say why other people like musicals. My cousin enjoys them because of the tight lycra suits some performers wear.
Dvarg

While I was deciding whether or not buying Scott Miller's book From Assassins To West Side Story, I came over this wonderful quote from the book, that I think is a great answer to the question:

Scott Miller wrote:
For many people, the appeal of a musical is its simplicity, its innocence. They go to see Hello, Dolly! to escape the often mind-bending task of living in our increasingly complicated, politically correct mine field of a world. For others, the musical is like any other narrative art form – it’s beauty is in it’s ability to make order out of chaos, to sort through the craziness of our lives and make sense of it all. We go to a Sondheim musical because we know he will say something to us that makes the world and the people around us a little easier to comprehend. We come out of Company understanding the complexities and compromises of marriage a little more clearly. We come out of Follies with a new resolve to live in the present instead of the past. We come out of Assassins realizing that people don’t fit neatly into categories, and more specifically, that these people aren’t as different from us as we’d like to believe. It makes us more tolerant of the people around us and may help us understand ourselves a little better. Best of all, while we leave the theatre with these new insights into the human condition, we may also be humming “Send In The Clowns”, You Could Drive A person Crazy” or “Everybody’s Got The Right”.
EponinesRain

Great quote, Dvarg. Still, this leaves the question of why musicals, specifically, are so appealing, and not just theatre; because you can cross boundaries and experience those things that Miller speaks of from film, too.

Here's what I've learned in class. I hope that this doesn't sound pedantic. I'm just really interested in music and media in general. Smile

What I’ve learned is that any narrative must keep its artificiality no matter what. That is to say, it’s the job of the cast/crew to keep the spectator immersed within the diegesis of the narrative, to never see the smoke and mirrors behind it all, so that it’s believable. (Of course this collapses with the star system and other things, but…) I think musicals are unique b/c the spectator consciously knows that all the music is being sung by the characters within the story yet they can still be “seduced” by the narrative plot. Meaning, nobody sings every single word in real life, so that’s to be unbelievable and the spectator can see its artificiality; but somehow, it works with musicals.

Characters in musicals also sing based on the action/circumstance, which is called the “Myth of Spontaneity”. For example, in Singin’ in the Rain, Don Lockwood spontaneously starts singing (and dancing >.>) in the rain b/c he is joyful about his new romance. So, musicals make it simpler, if you will, to let spectators see that people sing because they are happy, sad for cathartic purposes, or when an event is important enough to make a song. And since characters sing in natural response to life, this makes the performance (an act of culture), actually an act of nature. Thus, what is natural is understandable to everyone = universal/relatable. Hence, the argument that music is Esperanto.

Music and sound also accompany visual action so that spectators get a more complete perceptual experience. It shapes how a scene is interpreted, it gives a new value to silence, and directs attention to specific things within the scene. Plus, abstract ideas are always associated to different musical rhythms, melodies, instruments, etc. (trumpets= makes you think of something regal; church bells = peace, refuge, reverence). These are all ways that the producer/director can control how the spectator interprets the musical performance and how a spectator can relate to it. Music triggers memory, as well. Memory is another private instance that can be evoked from a public sphere (the musical performance) so that one naturally has a tie with what evoked it. But, I guess that's contingent on whether it is a good or bad memory…hrm…

There’s so much more to write, but I’m sure everybody is snoozing by now- heh! Sorry I’m so gung-ho about this. Obviously, I’m a film/media studies major, but I still have a lot to learn, too!
Dvarg

EponinesRain wrote:
Still, this leaves the question of why musicals, specifically, are so appealing, and not just theatre; because you can cross boundaries and experience those things that Miller speaks of from film, too.


True. (I submitted two posts, btw, maybe the first one gives a better answer?)

I think that the music in musicals helps to add layers of meaning, subtext and sometimes irony to the actual text, and that might be one further answer why musicals have the effects they have.
Pounce

Yes EponinesRain, I was thinking the same thing about Scott's comments. He wasn't pointing out what makes the musical so special.

It is interesting that between the musical and straight play, the musical is by far more popular. I can't think of any blockbuster straight plays off-hand (there might be some or even many but I think they pale compared to the success of the musical). Just as touring concerts attract large audiences, I think the musical has proven to be the most commercially viable of the touring forms of theater. Musicals successes in film have been uneven, but even a large majority of film rely on musical background to help evoke the desired emotion from the audience. From my experience, straight plays usually doesn't use background music to enhance the mood. The theatrical musical gives a story with the excitement of a live concert. A musical is more of a sensual experience than the straight play.
Dvarg

EponinesRain wrote:
Here's what I've learned in class. I hope that this doesn't sound pedantic.


Great post - exactly the kind I'd like there to be much more of here Very Happy
Cake_in_Song

I don't. I'm only here because somebody said there would be free cookies.
EponinesRain

Cake_in_Song wrote:
I don't. I'm only here because somebody said there would be free cookies.




FREE! Smile
Dvarg

EponinesRain wrote:
Obviously, I’m a film/media studies major, but I still have a lot to learn, too!


Do you have any exiting sources to recommend?
Sandra

Thank you very much...

Thank you very much, you are really helping me a lot!! Thanks. Smile
EponinesRain

Dvarg wrote:
EponinesRain wrote:
Obviously, I’m a film/media studies major, but I still have a lot to learn, too!


Do you have any exiting sources to recommend?


Actually, I do! Hrm...Jane Feuer has an excellent article about Singin' in the Rain as far as musicals go. Christian Metz is a huge figure for the semiotics in film and Walter Benjamin is also a key figure if you want to know more about visual culture. I wish I could remember the titles of the articles, but...I'll post them when I find out! For overall, more general film/media study, I really recommend David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson's Film Art: An Introduction. This book really helped me out.

For more about spectatorship and how modern cinema was overdetermined by previous acts of exhibition, I'd suggest Miriam Hansen's Babel and Babylon. < That is a very dense text, though. I had to read really slowly to digest it all + discuss with my TA about her theories. But, it's a pretty interesting.
Dvarg

EponinesRain wrote:
I wish I could remember the titles of the articles, but...I'll post them when I find out!


That'd be great Very Happy Thanks!
Milleh

Why do people like musicals?

Hmmmm...some would say theatre, others would say the music themselves.

Personally...I think alot of musicals reflect things in people's lives. They can relate to them;

Miss Saigon: War, giving your child away
Blood Brothers: Finding out you have another brother/sister, being in poverty
Oliver: Again, being in poverty, but managing to look on the bright side of life
Les Mis: War, hardship, love
Avenue Q: Alot of the songs relate to real life
Grease: School, friendships, growing up

^^ See. Alot of musicals do relate to real life and people can look at them and reflect back and think "they're going thru the same thing as me, they know my emotions"

Also, alot of it is mebbe the music itself. They hear one song and think "Wow" and find out about the show and the music and like the rest of it.

Or for some it maybe because they are just interested in theatre anyway and musicals is/can be part of it.

This is probably the worst thing you read lol but tis how I feel Very Happy
Eponine93

Milly, I like your idea but I think I'd find some of those things hard to relate to. Specifically your reasoning on Blood Brothers. How many people do you know that found out they had another, long-lost brother/sister?

Anyway, I think people like musicals either because they're entertaining or they have an emotional effect on them. Additionally, a lot of musicals produce a "warm and fuzzy" feeling. For the entertaining example, let's think along the lines of Spamalot. Is it deep? No. Funny? Yes.

Milly, I'm going to take your examples of Les Mis and Miss Saigon. Very few of us can relate to giving your child away, but we find inspiration in Kim's strengh. Additionally, it manipulates us emotionally in a way that makes us sad. I don't know why people like shows, movies, or books that make them cry (and I'm the biggest fan of depressing art) but it makes people like it.

Finally, a lot of people were introduced to more traditional musicals at an early age. We saw the movies with our parents, grandparents, or someone else we were close to. Seeing the musicals or listening to the music produces a warm and fuzzy feeling. Good feelings.

I know I wasn't being very articulate but hopefully people will get what I'm tryng to say. Next time I'll be more intellectual, I don't feel like it now.
Milleh

I just meant in General hun, like older people can relate to some of the issues but I can see where your coming from spesh about Kim's strength.
EponinesRain

Eponine93 wrote:
I don't know why people like shows, movies, or books that make them cry (and I'm the biggest fan of depressing art) but it makes people like it.


Because they surface and pardon the feelings that society tells us to conceal in order to be "strong". *Blinks* I'm getting too philosophical now, bwehehe... Anxious Romantics in the late 18th century believed that the emotion of sadness was the most expressive and genuine b/c it was cathartic of true emotions. Of course you can be genuinely joyful, but happiness is also easily rendered through sugar-coating. That's why I like dramas, like you, 93. They make me think about something inherent of myself.


Gargh! I read this really great article about why music is so evocative, but I can't remember the name of the magazine that I read it in!
Jordan

Eponine93 wrote:
Finally, a lot of people were introduced to more traditional musicals at an early age. We saw the movies with our parents, grandparents, or someone else we were close to. Seeing the musicals or listening to the music produces a warm and fuzzy feeling. Good feelings.


Hit the nail on the head for me. Forgive me those who've heard me say this before but Grease and SoM both instantly transport me back to my childhood, to a time when things weren't so hard, when things were innocent.

Both films can make me cry not because they're good films (they're not) but I adore both films because of the emotions they rouse of me for those simpler times in my childhood.

In the UK, SoM, Grease and King & I were all 'holiday' musicals that my family used to enjoy watching on TV.
Pounce

GayBoy wrote:
Grease and SoM...Both films can make me cry not because they're good films (they're not).

Yes they are! Evil or Very Mad
Dvarg

Milleh wrote:
Alot of musicals do relate to real life and people can look at them and reflect back and think "they're going thru the same thing as me, they know my emotions"


One reason I can't relate to for example Miss Saigon is that the characters seem to have too overblown - maybe "blunt" is the correct word? - emotions imo. I have no chance to experience that kind of emotionality as real or honest. They feel shallow.
Jordan

Pounce wrote:
GayBoy wrote:
Grease and SoM...Both films can make me cry not because they're good films (they're not).

Yes they are! Evil or Very Mad


Heh, they are good films to me, but I appreciate what other people say about them being rubbish but my emotional tie to them blanks out the negatives forever Cool
Ulla Dance Again!

There are certain musicals that I can relate to, in one way or another. Sometimes, I sort of categorize musicals - like if I'm in a silly mood, I'll watch Reefer Madness. If I want to be easily entertained, I'll watch The Producers.

Most of the time, I enjoy a [specific] musical because of its setting, or characters. Take my interest in Cabaret, for instance. The setting fascinates me - pre-war Berlin, rise of fascism and Hitler. If you look at it at face value, you might think there's nothing all too intriguing. Dig a little deeper, and you see how the world outside the Kit Kat Klub slowly makes its way in, and in the end, no one is safe.
nickhutson

The American Musical (whether it's pre R&H or post) has usually focused on celebrating life - or/and The American Dream. This is one of the main reasons why musicals make it in America. ALL the popular musicals look at growth of pride, growth of money and making it in the world.


Oklahoma, for example, concentrates on a piece of land belonging to the frontier becoming part of the United States. Also covers the solving of the little "civil" war they have going on in OK - with the farmer and the cowman becoming friends.

The King and I...teaching western (American) values to another part of the world. Even though Anna is a British character, it might as well be a character from Manhattan.

The Sound of Music...teaching teaching western (American) values to another part of the world. Even though Maria is an Austrian character, it might as well be a character from Manhattan.

South Pacific...Americans interacting with the Pacific Islands

My Fair Lady, even though set in England, covers the American dream quite simply - a rags to riches story...

How to Succeed in Business...American Dream

Ragtime...goes without saying...



Of course - these are only classic musicals (apart from Ragtime), but they really are the most respected ones for scholars. This all went a bit topsy-turvy when the Brits took over Broadway (which a lot of Americans disliked) and we got songs like "The American Dream" which was a parody of what musicals had been about for many, many years.

But, mainly, musicals are about celebrating life. It's about the intergration of telling positive stories, singing and dancing.
Dvarg

nickhutson wrote:
But, mainly, musicals are about celebrating life. It's about the intergration of telling positive stories, singing and dancing.


I think I disagree so strongly.

I agree with you on oklahoma and TSOM, as They aren't really about anything. Ragtime I haven't seen.

nickhutson wrote:
The King and I...teaching western (American) values to another part of the world. Even though Anna is a British character, it might as well be a character from Manhattan.


I thought the point of TKAI was about how cultural exchange can be valuable for both sides, not that Western culture is superior to Eastern culture.

nickhutson wrote:
South Pacific...Americans interacting with the Pacific Islands


Isn't it about racism, and how racist Americans learn to come to terms with their despicable values?

nickhutson wrote:
My Fair Lady, even though set in England, covers the American dream quite simply - a rags to riches story...


It's about how cultural differences create class boundaries that ideally should not be there.

nickhutson wrote:
How to Succeed in Business...American Dream


I am not very familiar with the show, but I though the point of it was satire on the Americal Dream, not a celebration of it.

nickhutson wrote:
Of course - these are only classic musicals, but they really are the most respected ones for scholars.


What about Carousel, Cabaret, A Chorus Line, West Side Story, Candide, Chicago, Gypsy and the entire Sondheim canon which by and large consist of criticism of the American Dream?
nickhutson

Wwich is why Sondheim has never been a commerical success...
Salome

Pounce wrote:
GayBoy wrote:
Grease and SoM...Both films can make me cry not because they're good films (they're not).

Yes they are! Evil or Very Mad


SOM wasntc great musical to begin with..the film only made it worse by cutting the best songs and adding lackluster ones.

Grease ..the only good thing about it is the stunt casting of all the 1950s icons in the adult roles.
Dvarg

nickhutson wrote:
Wwich is why Sondheim has never been a commerical success...


I was under the inpression you tried to prove your point by referring to musicals that are respected by scholars:

nickhutson wrote:
Of course - these are only classic musicals, but they really are the most respected ones for scholars.


Besides, most of those other musicals I mentioned are both respected by scholars and great commercial successes while being critical towards the American dream. I think that proves that musicals - as a genre - doesn't have to celebrate the American dream.
Pounce

Salome wrote:
Pounce wrote:
GayBoy wrote:
Grease and SoM...Both films can make me cry not because they're good films (they're not).

Yes they are! Evil or Very Mad


SOM wasntc great musical to begin with..the film only made it worse by cutting the best songs and adding lackluster ones.

Grease ..the only good thing about it is the stunt casting of all the 1950s icons in the adult roles.

Com'on. Both are considered classics of cinema. SoM even took 5 Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Score. The American Film Institute lists SoM as #4 and Grease as #20 on its list of the 25 Best Movie Musicals.
Eponine93

Pounce, where can I find the list of top 25 film musicals? I'm really curious as to which ones are on top...
Pounce

Eponine93 wrote:
Pounce, where can I find the list of top 25 film musicals? I'm really curious as to which ones are on top...

Where else? At the AFI site Wink

http://www.afi.com/tvevents/100years/musicals.aspx
Dvarg

Pounce wrote:
The American Film Institute lists SoM as #4 and Grease as #20 on its list of the 25 Best Movie Musicals.


I wonder what their criteria were? One place it says these are the most memorable musicals.
Pounce

Well, this was the ballot

http://www.afi.com/Docs/tvevents/pdf/musicals_ballot.pdf

and it is titled Greatest Movie Musicals

and according to AFI's site the jury was "of over 500 film artists, composers, musicians, critics and historians".
Pounce

Dvarg wrote:
nickhutson wrote:
But, mainly, musicals are about celebrating life. It's about the intergration of telling positive stories, singing and dancing.


I think I disagree so strongly.

I agree with you on oklahoma and TSOM, as They aren't really about anything. Ragtime I haven't seen.

I don't agree that TSOM isn't about anything. It's about the character Maria growing and finding her purpose in life. It's about how much art (in this case music) gives value to life. It's about a widower getting in touch with his children again and moving on with his life after his wife's death. It's about facing life's changes and challenges. It tells us that life is more than work and duty. If we miss love and relationships then we have missed life.

Quote:
nickhutson wrote:
The King and I...teaching western (American) values to another part of the world. Even though Anna is a British character, it might as well be a character from Manhattan.


I thought the point of TKAI was about how cultural exchange can be valuable for both sides, not that Western culture is superior to Eastern culture.

It's been a while since I've seen it but I've viewed it as a story of the interaction of different cultures and how each side must find a way to co-exist.

Quote:
nickhutson wrote:
South Pacific...Americans interacting with the Pacific Islands


Isn't it about racism, and how racist Americans learn to come to terms with their despicable values?

Again, I haven't seen it in a while but it seems to be similar to TKaI but as nickhutson described. Racism is a theme of the show and the song "Carefully Taught" was controversial in the Southern US. The song's message was clear and it stepped on some toes in the Southern culture. I think South Pacific also tried to catch the essence of life of the US soldiers so far from home in WWII.

Quote:
nickhutson wrote:
How to Succeed in Business...American Dream


I am not very familiar with the show, but I though the point of it was satire on the Americal Dream, not a celebration of it.

Right, it was a satirical view of the American business world. It spoofed the American Dream.

Quote:
nickhutson wrote:
Of course - these are only classic musicals, but they really are the most respected ones for scholars.


What about Carousel, Cabaret, A Chorus Line, West Side Story, Candide, Chicago, Gypsy and the entire Sondheim canon which by and large consist of criticism of the American Dream?

Right, WWS and the song "America" certainly comes to mind. The girls singing the promises of the American Dream and the boys mocking its reality. Chicago certainly showed those seeking the American Dream by unscrupulous means. HAiR was about as anti-estabishment and anti-American Dream as I can think of.
Jordan

Pounce wrote:
Dvarg wrote:
I agree with you on oklahoma and TSOM, as They aren't really about anything.

I don't agree that TSOM isn't about anything. It's about the character Maria growing and finding her purpose in life. It's about how much art (in this case music) gives value to life. It's about a widower getting in touch with his children again and moving on with his life after his wife's death. It's about facing life's changes and challenges. It tells us that life is more than work and duty. If we miss love and relationships then we have missed life.


No Pounce, Dvarg is right, SoM isn't about anything at all since you put it in those terms Wink
Pounce

GayBoy wrote:
Pounce wrote:
Dvarg wrote:
I agree with you on oklahoma and TSOM, as They aren't really about anything.

I don't agree that TSOM isn't about anything. It's about the character Maria growing and finding her purpose in life. It's about how much art (in this case music) gives value to life. It's about a widower getting in touch with his children again and moving on with his life after his wife's death. It's about facing life's changes and challenges. It tells us that life is more than work and duty. If we miss love and relationships then we have missed life.


No Pounce, Dvarg is right, SoM isn't about anything at all since you put it in those terms Wink

Yeah...ya right! (pops open a beer) ****beeeeelch**** What wus I thinkin'? All that matters in life is getting as meny wimen as ya can and that yer team wins the champeenship! All TSOM means is stay away from them Nazis! Those guys will kill ya! Shocked Scuse me! I gotta take a dump! "Climb e'vry Moutin, forge evry Streeeeeam, foller ev'ry rainboooow! Till yer team wins the gaaaaaaame!!!!" Aw hell, it didn't rhyme. Mad
Jordan

Pounce wrote:
Yeah...ya right! (pops open a beer) ****beeeeelch**** What wus I thinkin'? All that matters in life is getting as meny wimen as ya can and that yer team wins the champeenship! All TSOM means is stay away from them Nazis! Those guys will kill ya! Shocked Scuse me! I gotta take a dump! "Climb e'vry Moutin, forge evry Streeeeeam, foller ev'ry rainboooow! Till yer team wins the gaaaaaaame!!!!" Aw hell, it didn't rhyme. Mad


Yeah, now try not to be so wordy and to use more sarcasm in your next post. It works. It's a wonderfully fine balance. Don't dissect the previous post either.
Dvarg

Pounce wrote:
and according to AFI's site the jury was "of over 500 film artists, composers, musicians, critics and historians".


Yup, and it would be nice to know what their criteria were, so I could decide if I agree with their choices or not.

Pounce wrote:
I don't agree that TSOM isn't about anything.


It was an exaggeration. I just wasn't in the mood to dissect TSOM. My point was perhaps that in my opinion, the show doesn't do a very good job at being about what it is about. Which doesn't mean I do not enjoy belting out Do Re Mi in counterpoint as much as the next man.

As for the rest of your post, are you contradicting me? Or are you confirming my view? It is a little har to tell.
Pounce

Dvarg wrote:
Pounce wrote:
and according to AFI's site the jury was "of over 500 film artists, composers, musicians, critics and historians".


Yup, and it would be nice to know what their criteria were, so I could decide if I agree with their choices or not.

My impression is that since the survey was titled Greatest Movie Musicals they were asking the respondents which films were the best. And since they approached artists, composers, musicians, and critics, it was probably left up to these individuals to decide for themselves what criteria to choose.

Quote:
Pounce wrote:
I don't agree that TSOM isn't about anything.


It was an exaggeration. I just wasn't in the mood to dissect TSOM. My point was perhaps that in my opinion, the show doesn't do a very good job at being about what it is about. Which doesn't mean I do not enjoy belting out Do Re Mi in counterpoint as much as the next man.

As for the rest of your post, are you contradicting me? Or are you confirming my view? It is a little har to tell.

A little of both. After WWII and the start of the Cold War, there certainly was a selling of American ideals in American entertainment. It was a generation anxious to put behind the war and the American Depression and offer a new vision for the world. But some of that and the next generation could see the emptiness in materialism. That was even a theme in Disney's Mary Poppins. Where Mr. Banks was too caught up in his work and didn't have time for his children. I've often wondered if that message (back in the early 1960s) was more directed to Americans and wasn't the case in Britain?
Dvarg

Pounce wrote:
it was probably left up to these individuals to decide for themselves what criteria to choose.


Probably. And, as I said, it would be interresting to know what those criteria were.

Pounce wrote:
A little of both.


I wasn't denying musicals can be celebrating the American Dream, I was denying musicals have to celebrate it.
feedetincelle

I agree with Dvarg, not all musicals have to celebrate the American dream but I can see a lot of them that does.

I think most of the people before me have already said all the good points of why musicals are so popular; and each and every one deserves an applaud for their work and effort in delivering not only entertaining but beautiful performances. I sure remember every bit of all the musicals I've seen so far.

I personally love watching a broadway production because I seem to immerse in it more than being in a cinema. Most of it comes from respect to the performers, composer, writer and choreographer. I think music is a powerful mean of communication because it tends to stick to your head and forms a strong memory (may it be bad or good).

I'm not going to bore you with all the points that I want to say since it's all been conveyed eloquently by some of you on this thread.

Lovely!
Big_Dave

Well the reason why i think musicals are soooooo great!! in the old classic musicals they all have somewot of a happy ending!! they are just feel gd things no matter how crap you feel stick a decent musical on and all your troubles seem to go!! lol. there are exceptions to the rule of course....les mis now thats jus depressin.....ace but depressin!!

Big Dave
Dvarg

Big_Dave wrote:
in the old classic musicals they all have somewot of a happy ending!! they are just feel gd things no matter how crap you feel stick a decent musical on and all your troubles seem to go!! lol


I have a feeling that is also the answer to why a lot of people detest musicals so intensely, too Wink
theonetowatch

I hate musicals.
Dvarg

theonetowatch wrote:
I hate musicals.


You've come to the right place, then.

One reason I love musicals, is that (in those I consider good) all details are so well thought through.
Yip1982

I have a funny feeling that people like musicals for a combination of the above reasons discussed before. Musicals are an avenue for people to unite and meld the emotions of theatre with the emotions of music. Apart from that, musicals help them make sense of such a layered, complicated world. I know that not many people will warm to musicals that create a fuzzy feeling (i.e. in the manner of the R&Hs and the L&Ls), but these shows would lend us a sincerity that encourages us that all will be well.
Dvarg

This morning I found yet another aspect of why I like musicals. I thinkm it might have to do with multidimentionality in a way.

A lot of music lacks a dimention of time. Instead of moving from one point to another (like when a musical song works as a dramaturgical scene), many songs (like rock songs, disco songs and even songs of classical music) work structurally like a circle or without a time dimention. Instead they describe an emotion, or return to a previous lyric without necessarily developping during its duration.

Also a lot of non musical theatre songs do work with a time dimention, for example when they tell a story. But often they lack a space dimention. I think ths can be parallelled with what Sondheim learned from Robbins when working with WSS. When presenting Robbins for Something's Coming (I think), Robbins asked 'But what does he do?' In musicals there are a space diimention I think perhaps lacks in other sorts of music because when composing the song, the composer/lyricist also have to consider what the performer is to do while performing the song (in another way than making a non telling choreography like disco, for example).
Pounce

Dvarg wrote:
This morning I found yet another aspect of why I like musicals. I thinkm it might have to do with multidimentionality in a way.

A lot of music lacks a dimention of time. Instead of moving from one point to another (like when a musical song works as a dramaturgical scene), many songs (like rock songs, disco songs and even songs of classical music) work structurally like a circle or without a time dimention. Instead they describe an emotion, or return to a previous lyric without necessarily developping during its duration.

Also a lot of non musical theatre songs do work with a time dimention, for example when they tell a story. But often they lack a space dimention. I think ths can be parallelled with what Sondheim learned from Robbins when working with WSS. When presenting Robbins for Something's Coming (I think), Robbins asked 'But what does he do?' In musicals there are a space diimention I think perhaps lacks in other sorts of music because when composing the song, the composer/lyricist also have to consider what the performer is to do while performing the song (in another way than making a non telling choreography like disco, for example).

Interesting idea, I think sometimes a song in a show is a suspension of time. That's especially true of a "showstopping" number which doesn't always offer something to advance the story but rather is meant to wow the audience. But showstoppers do seem to be fraught with "things to do". Songs that are introspective usually don't offer much for the singer to do other than show emotion but I suppose it has a time dimension as the character works toward some conclusion. But even then, I think some songs just relate intense emotion and the dancing is just an extension of that emotion and again, time stands still. But I can see how some pop songs lack dimension and it's often interesting to see what nonsense dresses up a song in a music video. Shocked
LaGataNegra

Music is something people respond to on a visceral level. The theatrical experience gives a feeling of community; everyone in the audience is being affected at the same time. The actors are feeling what they're singing. The audience can absorb this emotion more strongly than they can when they're watching a movie. Live performance forms a stronger bond than a celluloid performance.

We also like being told stories, and being sung to. It's a throwback to our childhoods.
mozurkz

The reason musicals are popular is because when you go to see a play, you have a greater immersion, and it's a lot more fun then simply seeing a movie, but the emotions can't be conveyed strongly enough in a strait play, something the closeups/sountrack/fake tears does in a movie. so it needs something that can convey the emotions of the characters, and music, being the language of emotions, is the perfect fit. The music in musicals speaks to your heart, and when you listen to the music, you truly feel for the characters. Musical music is better then popular music because it makes you feel emotions, connecting you to the characters.
       Musicals.Net Forums -> The Stage Door
Page 1 of 1