Archive for Musicals.Net Musicals.Net
 


       Musicals.Net Forums -> Mary Poppins
Gobsmacker

Mary Poppins - London

I just returned from London where I caught a performance of MARY POPPINS at the Pr. Edward Theatre. The stage version differs from 1964 classic film. The stage show contains familiar songs and themes from the movie, but it is truer to PL Travers' books.

The stage version has a little "harder edge" compared to the sticky sweetness of Disney's film. There are new characters (namely, Miss Andrew--a drill sergeant of a nanny). Jane & Michael are far brattier and devious than the kids in the film + there are a few added songs ( notably 'Practically Perfect').

The cast, overall, is terrific: Scarlett Strallen is superb as MP, and Gavin Lee is outstanding as Bert. They alone, are worth the lofty price of admission. The Jolly Holiday and Supercalifragilstiexpalisous scenes are very colorful and enegetic. The 'Step in Time' seemed a little static on stage however. I really enjoyed the macabre scene, TEMPER, TEMPER! where Mary casts a spell on the toys in the nursery--but this scene may be too scary for young children. Also, the 'Feed The Birds' sequence is especially poignant.

The highlight, of course, is Mary's umbrella flight over the stage & audience--it's a magical moment.

I really enjoyed the stage version, but nothing will ever compare to Julie Andrews in this unforgettable role.
Aimee

I love the chim-chimminey [however its spelt] bit. I wish I could dance like that.

*sigh*
Brother Marvin Hinten, S.

Chim Chim Cheree.
Aimee

LOL, when you're with a sweep.....
liza_minelli

I saw MP last Wednesday!! It's amazing, though the kids were a bit over the top with diction.. but, you know, its a big theatre...
Fantine

Awww I wanna go... Crying or Very sad
liza_minelli

Go the next time you get the chance. The Supercalifragilisticexpealidocious scene is amazing!!
cabaretfreak

I hope the broadway will be just as great as the one in London.
Yasmin

I did see this with Laura Michelle Kelly who was in the original cast. She was absolutely brilliant, and I thought she really made the show!

My fave scene was when all the toys in the nursery become life size!
musikal_geek

Whoa creepy....

Just as I read this thread, a parody of "Step in Time" came on TV.

Let's hope that I didn't just make an @$$ of myself, because I'm not even 100% sure that Step in Time is from MP...... Embarassed
Fantine

It is. It's the rooftop scene with the chimney sweeps.
panda

hay

yer i saw mary poppins i really liked it coz it is for both children and adletn i know i was sacred buy the tmpet bit but io like the way theyhave used a lot from the books so its back to its origlanl form coz i ahve read some of the books and they are fab I really liked buirts tap daicng very good and i like the way he walks aroudn the stage very clever lol
my fav bit was in the park jolly holiday but i was hoping for live pengings lol but it was very good and reccomed it
Tiny-Tot

Can't Wait for this this to come to BW. I got the London recording and it is great. Very Happy
musikal_geek

B'way in November!!
London_Mungojerrie

Re: Mary Poppins - London

Gobsmacker wrote:
The cast, overall, is terrific: Scarlett Strallen is superb as MP, and Gavin ### is outstanding as Bert. They alone, are worth the lofty price of admission. The Jolly Holiday and Supercalifragilstiexpalisous scenes are very colorful and enegetic. The 'Step in Time' seemed a little static on stage however. I really enjoyed the macabre scene, TEMPER, TEMPER! where Mary casts a spell on the toys in the nursery--but this scene may be too scary for young children. Also, the 'Feed The Birds' sequence is especially poignant.


Scarlett Strallen is CRAP! She is a terrible Mary Poppins. Mary Poppins was a great show and then she came along and ruined the show.
Gavin ### is very good as Bert though.
The new Winifred Banks is RUBBISH too! Not even a tiny bit as good as Linzi Hately.
The new cast really isn't nearly as good as the original cast. The original cast was SPECTACULAR!
Yasmin

Quote:
The original cast was SPECTACULAR!


HERE HERE! Laura Michelle Kelly was the best Mary Poppins yet
mm

I personally think Scarlett Strallen is amazing, she is a great actress with a beautiful voice and not as wooden and fake as LMK. LMK has a beautiful voice, no discussion about that but her acting was rather weak every time I saw the show with her!
I remember that Michael Banks asks Mary Poppins to be cross again when she gives him the present and says something to him nearly at the end of the show - LMK was hardly cross in the show at any time! From facial impressions all you would get is a cheap smile and that's about it, at other times she would not even move a muscle in her pretty face but just move her eyes, just looking good is not enough.
Scarlett Strallen gives Mary Poppins so much life - her Mary Poppins is stern and strict and kind and caring at the same time portraying a much more complex nanny. And she is a lovely sincere young woman offstage with a big heart - LMK seemed too 'professional' each time I saw her.
The new cast is not too bad, certainly not as amazing as the original cast, but they have improved so much since November. I couldn't stand Aden and Eliza the first time and these days both impress me each time I see the show - the only one really annoying me is the current Robertson Ay, his understudies are far more talented.
TR_Wolf

Re: Mary Poppins - London

London_Mungojerrie wrote:

Scarlett Strallen is CRAP! She is a terrible Mary Poppins. Mary Poppins was a great show and then she came along and ruined the show.
Gavin ### is very good as Bert though.
The new Winifred Banks is RUBBISH too! Not even a tiny bit as good as Linzi Hately.
The new cast really isn't nearly as good as the original cast. The original cast was SPECTACULAR!


Just to point out, someone can have an opinion other than your own and it can still have merit. Just because you preferred the original cast doesnt mean that the new cast is "crap" just because you liked the originals more.
jpman

Jonah Lees will take over the part of Michael Banks this winter while his twin brother Christian will play tall boy in Billy Elliot the Musical.

http://www.billyelliotfans.com/forum1/viewtopic.php?p=13084#13084
candlestickjay

I caught a showing (and I mean caught, I went in 2 hours before the show and snagged some balcony seats) back in June and absolutely loved it. Came back to the states with merchandice coming out of places I didn't know I had. But I really enjoyed that. Personally I was just shocked and overjoyed by the stage set up. Thats one thing I was really able to enjoy was the set because we were up so high, you could really see how it came out smoothly and how everything was so neatly choreographed andd....ahh it was just lovely. Personally I do prefer LMK, but I think ending up about 2 yards vertically from her as she flew over my head was just cool enough for me. I loved her version of Practically Perfect and then Chimchimerrie with whatshisname. I came out singing! Overall, just a wonderful show, and honestly, I don't think Bway will be able to top it, if only because we can't fake British accents like the British. XD d'oh!
DefyGravityFan

We saw it in London when it first came out...it is darker than the Disney version as it more closely follows the book, but it is SO good! We're hoping to see it in NYC when we visit next year!
Scottish_freak

I saw MP this summer And unfortunately was slightly dissapointed!

I loved the idea of the show and was great to see well known characters from one of my favourite movies as a kid on stage! I suppose i set my expectations a bit to high as i had just finished a show where i had played Mary P!

Overall the show was really good and the set was excellent! the woman playing Mary though really irritated me! I felt she was too busy trying to get through the show than enjoy the moment!

The show is alot darker than the film aswell! which was fine by me as obviously it couldn't stay disney cheese forever but that bit when the toys come to life scared the bejingus out of me! i was with my theatre group and ended up having to swap seats with someone cause a few of the the kids were really scared!

loved the stunts though - the flying by MP and the walking on the ceiling by Bert was pure genius!
musikal_geek

Scottish_freak wrote:
walking on the ceiling by Bert was pure genius!


How did they do that?
TR_Wolf

musikal_geek wrote:
Scottish_freak wrote:
walking on the ceiling by Bert was pure genius!


How did they do that?


Well they've given away a bit of a highlight there, but Bert goes from being stood normal on stage, no wires etc, and walks up the wall, then along the ceiling and tap dances on the ceiling. It's ridiculously impressive, and Ive no idea how they do it!

Magic I guess Wink
Jekkienumber24601

It is very carefully concealed wires. Trust me, with enough money you can do anything these days. Always be open to anything (didn't you see the prestige?)
TR_Wolf

Jekkienumber24601 wrote:
It is very carefully concealed wires. Trust me, with enough money you can do anything these days. Always be open to anything (didn't you see the prestige?)


Even more concealed than in Chitty? Cos some of the wires in that were near invisible, but some, like the Baloon Seller at the funfair were really strikingly obvious
London_Mungojerrie

TR_Wolf wrote:
Jekkienumber24601 wrote:
It is very carefully concealed wires. Trust me, with enough money you can do anything these days. Always be open to anything (didn't you see the prestige?)


Even more concealed than in Chitty? Cos some of the wires in that were near invisible, but some, like the Baloon Seller at the funfair were really strikingly obvious


Chitty didn't use wires Wink It was a mecanical arm under the car Wink
musikal_geek

So, did it actually look like he was walking upside-down? (I haven't seen it).

All three shows I saw used flying (BatB - Gaston falling, WICKED - Monkeys, TLK - Scar falling) and they used painfully obvious black wires every time. Mad
TR_Wolf

London_Mungojerrie wrote:
TR_Wolf wrote:
Jekkienumber24601 wrote:
It is very carefully concealed wires. Trust me, with enough money you can do anything these days. Always be open to anything (didn't you see the prestige?)


Even more concealed than in Chitty? Cos some of the wires in that were near invisible, but some, like the Baloon Seller at the funfair were really strikingly obvious


Chitty didn't use wires Wink It was a mecanical arm under the car Wink


No, I mean when the kids fly, when the balloon seller flies etc. Some wires were good, some were blatant!

And yes, it does look like he's walking/dancing upside down!
LesMisForever

Hello

I saw the show sometime in March 2006. I enjoyed it very much, and i thought that Scarlett was "Practically Perfect" Smile . Gavin Lee was excellent as well.
The "Supercali........" number was amazing, and the theatre joined in clapping. It was really great stuff.
As for the wires. Yes, there are wires, and i actually saw them because i was sitting fairly close to the stage. It is impressive neverhtless. But if you don't see them it is even better.
Mary flew within a touching distance from me.
Chim Chim Cheree is probably the best tune of the show.
wls250

Re: Mary Poppins - London

Gobsmacker wrote:

The highlight, of course, is Mary's umbrella flight over the stage & audience--it's a magical moment.


Does she fly with it then?
Impossible Dream

Before I go to see this (and I'm thinking of using my Theatre Tokens for it), are there any explosions/sudden loud noises during the show? I know that in the original movie the Step In Time number has fireworks going off in the background ...
hedge_hog

Impossible Dream wrote:
Before I go to see this (and I'm thinking of using my Theatre Tokens for it), are there any explosions/sudden loud noises during the show? I know that in the original movie the Step In Time number has fireworks going off in the background ...


One for certain: when Miss Andrew disappears, there's an explosion
ado amber

thats rad i want to see it now...i think im gonna move to london so i can see mary poppins and also so i can see daniel radcliffe exposed
TR_Wolf

musikal_geek wrote:
So, did it actually look like he was walking upside-down? (I haven't seen it).

All three shows I saw used flying (BatB - Gaston falling, WICKED - Monkeys, TLK - Scar falling) and they used painfully obvious black wires every time. Mad


Whenever I saw Beauty and the Beast, I never saw Gaston use wires for his fall, he just fell backwards over the side of the wall and seemingly landed on a cushion stage right behind a bit of scenery.

The black wires thing I dunno, in Chitty, the kids flying looked amazing, couldnt see the wires, but in the fairground scene, a balloon seller comes on, and both times I saw the show, when he comes on, you immediately see two ugly wires right obviously behind them, highlighted by a stage light, so it spoils the magic.
Jordan

I think the walking thing works in MP. Sure, you can see he has wires but it's a different set up to normal wire work, I don't know how to describe it properly.
       Musicals.Net Forums -> Mary Poppins
Page 1 of 1