Archive for Musicals.Net Musicals.Net
 


       Musicals.Net Forums -> Evita
actionjaxson91

Madonna or Patti?

Vote!!!!
Mara

I choose Patti because I like her voice better. It's got more substance. Madonna doesn't really do it for me.
Radames's_Angel

Lupone, Her voice is awesome, and also Madonna had her voice altered (watch it in surround sound and you'll hear it...)
Sweeney Hyde

Madonna was horrible. However, as I have only every heard LuPone, I'm not really at liability to say.
jessiemil42

Madonna against Patti

Patti of course!


how can you even compare them??
norayouadora

Sweeney Hyde wrote:
Madonna was horrible. However, as I have only every heard LuPone, I'm not really at liability to say.

Me too. But I voted for Patti anyways because I <3 her. Very Happy

I don't anticipate that she was worse than Madonna, anyways. Lol.
aboutface

I voted for Patti. There was no comparison.
jcstar

I voted for Madonna because her "Lament" destroys me everytime.

She has an uncanny resemblence to Eva Peron. Madonna also had similar experiences that Eva had to deal with.

And, contrary to popular belief, her voice was NOT altered. Some keys were changed, but that doesn't matter much.

Now, I enjoy Patti as well. She is dynomite in the role, no question. I just enjoyed the film because I was able to talk to other high school kids when it came out... and \I didn't feel like an outsider when discussing EVITA. Because people who didn't knoqw Brioadway or the West End (or Eva Peron) would talk to me about it.

Andy.
thewordisno

Oh, I wish there were an Elaine Paige option Sad
There not being one, I must go for Madonna.
WelshGal05

I would say Elena Roger, but as she is not listed I will vote for "Madonna".
adamjthompson

Madonna for me. She did an amazing job, IMHO. Antonio Banderas stole the show, though. Very Happy
DanUSGS

Eh it wasn't Patti's best.
Salome

Madonna destroyed the role. she made Eva sympathetic. thats like making a musical about Hitler and making him a nice guy.

Madonna couldnt act the role and vocally thy had to adjust far too many songs.

Patti owns the role. always will.
duchessina

adamjthompson wrote:
Madonna for me. She did an amazing job, IMHO. Antonio Banderas stole the show, though. Very Happy


Really? I never liked him.
Madonna's got a voice like tinfoil. Not much substance.
Salome

Banderas was wonderful as Ches...not a good as many but miles ahead of david essex.
SuperKabob

Salome wrote:
Banderas was wonderful as Ches...not a good as many but miles ahead of david essex.



He bugged me. Kept looking AT the camera and just sounded like Antonio Banderas the entire time. I think High Flying Adored was his only real good song.
DontDoSadnessxx

Patti LuPone for me. There will always be shows that I'll say i disliked her in but this show always remain true.

My parents saw Evita with her. AHHH
im still jealous to this day.
=]
ilovebway

Patti for me as well.
Salome

SuperKabob wrote:
Salome wrote:
Banderas was wonderful as Ches...not a good as many but miles ahead of david essex.



He bugged me. Kept looking AT the camera and just sounded like Antonio Banderas the entire time. I think High Flying Adored was his only real good song.


he was suppossed to look at the camera!
Flamy

Anybody, but not Patti Lupone (for me).
mantarnia

Salome wrote:
Madonna destroyed the role. she made Eva sympathetic. thats like making a musical about Hitler and making him a nice guy.

Madonna couldnt act the role and vocally thy had to adjust far too many songs.

Patti owns the role. always will.




Wrong she didn't make it sympathetic, the producer and director did with the daft idea of giving her "another suitcase another hall".
jcstar

SuperKabob wrote:
Salome wrote:
Banderas was wonderful as Ches...not a good as many but miles ahead of david essex.



He bugged me. Kept looking AT the camera and just sounded like Antonio Banderas the entire time. I think High Flying Adored was his only real good song.


Che is the Narrator of the story. He is looking at the camera because he is addressing the audience... most of the time.

Andy.
SuperKabob

Yes, but there are other ways of adressing the audience of the movie than staring at them...at least the way he was doing it.
Yip1982

For me it would be a choice between Patti and Elena Roger. It's true that Patti has the pipes to belt her part as needed but I think that Elena Roger's part is growing on me.
tortallcit

Madonna. Maybe it's just because I saw the movie before I heard the stage musical... but I've always preferred it. Especially "Buenos Aires".
moongoddess82

I think they both had their strengths and their weaknesses... definitely Madonna's voice was not up to the part as-written but I liked her slightly more demure, vulnerable Eva. However, I seriously dislike Patti's acting and I only like some of the songs from the show in her voice.

I think "A Waltz for Eva and Che" explains beautifully how Eva should be portrayed- by that I mean fallible, lead by suggestion/mass opinion at times and having a desire to be needed/"loved" . I think the show has things intentionally written in to make her very human. It makes Eva more real to give her a characterization that the audience can at least, to a point, sympathize with.

Every human being has a "good" side, no one is purely evil... de-humanizing someone by seeing them as pure evil so that we can put them and their actions into a category we are able to understand and handle does not change this fact. Please don't mistake this for my condoning either Eva's or Hitler's actions- I am simply saying that to play Eva as pure evil with no sympathetic qualities would be less realistic. By the same token, if Eva is "likeable" as an overall character. then perhaps that might be taking it too far the other way.
       Musicals.Net Forums -> Evita
Page 1 of 1